Public disclosure for carbon abatement: African decision-makers in a PROPER public good experiment

SALDRU Repository

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Akpalu, Wisdom
dc.contributor.author Abidoye, Babatunde
dc.contributor.author Muchapondwa, Edwin
dc.contributor.author Simbanegavi, Witness
dc.date.accessioned 2017-09-26T11:27:45Z
dc.date.available 2017-09-26T11:27:45Z
dc.date.issued 2017
dc.identifier.citation Wisdom Akpalu, Babatunde Abidoye, Edwin Muchapondwa & Witness Simbanegavi (2017) Public disclosure for carbon abatement: African decision-makers in a PROPER public good experiment, Climate and Development, 9:6, 548-558, DOI:10.1080/17565529.2016.1174664 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2016.1174664
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/11090/893
dc.description.abstract A linear public good experiment adopted from Holt and Laury [1997. Classroom games: Voluntary provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(4), 209–215.] has been employed to investigate strategic behaviour in pollution abatement among African climate decision-makers. The experiment consisted of three groups, of which groups 2 and 3 received one and two treatments, respectively. The first treatment entailed publicly disclosing the pollution of each member of a group by placing a corresponding colour-coded card in front of each subject, while the second involved the withdrawal of the public disclosure. Group 2 received the first treatment; Group 3 received both the first and second treatments in succession. We found that the untreated group (baseline) polluted more than the two treated groups, and there was no statistically significant difference between the pollution abatement of the two treated groups. These results suggest that public disclosure potentially drives pollution abatement and that its eventual withdrawal does not obliterate abatement behaviour. We did not observe conditional cooperation but average pollution declined over time. Furthermore, individuals who thought it was unfair for Africa to reduce emissions polluted more. We also found that pollution levels differ significantly between males and females. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher Climate and Development en_US
dc.subject public good experiment en_US
dc.subject carbon abatement en_US
dc.subject public disclosure en_US
dc.subject Africa en_US
dc.title Public disclosure for carbon abatement: African decision-makers in a PROPER public good experiment en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search OpenSALDRU


Browse

My Account

Statistics